Mega Discussion!L2walker versus L2NET!

[ibelovedx]

i hate scripting but l2net is def way better and open ended

[mpj123]

omg sup beloved! (from prophecy right?)

[[genom“]

For Me Walker most stable.

[slothmo]

you know what....while i believe you are a really talented botter/programmer i believe you are not a proffesional...

pro's would act like this:

Customer:this is complicated

Creator of l2net:you think so?i will try to make it less complicated with more photos and videos so that

you can understand it better....

 

 

Don't take it as an attack just as a friendly advice....

mpj didn't make L2.Net... and fyi v384 makes some huge strides towards addressing usability issues that people have with L2.Net.

[Er4g0n]

L2W is better for me cose eazier way to make scripts and if u are a good scripeter u can make almost anithink

[dani3l]

L2W is better for me cose eazier way to make scripts and if u are a good scripeter u can make almost anithink

l2.net scripts may seem complicated,a few of them really are very complicated,but with a decent brain and a grain of logic it's not really that difficult to make net scripts better than walker ones

[Furion™]

All say that L2Net is more helpful but i cant work with this only with Walker :/

[mpj123]

you know what....while i believe you are a really talented botter/programmer i believe you are not a proffesional...

pro's would act like this:

Customer:this is complicated

Creator of l2net:you think so?i will try to make it less complicated with more photos and videos so that

you can understand it better....

 

 

Don't take it as an attack just as a friendly advice....

 

There is alot going on behind the scenes that you do not know about, like Slothmo said, I am not the developer of L2.NET, more of a senior user and community manager... I try and address the complaints in person, many times I will talk to the devs and address such issues with fellow other advanced members to come up with solutions.

 

I personally do not see users as customers as L2.NET is mostly free, in the long run, I have spent over 500$ towards L2.NET and its devs to help support the bot. I make videos whenever something is unclear, the latest is the L2.NET login guide, I made over 6 other videos explaining features and basic login features as well, and well over 20 written well documented guides.

 

I can only help people so much, people have to help themselves beforehand. I remember when I started to bot with L2Walker, everything was so unfamiliar... but as you use it more and more, you become savy and can fend for yourself. Same with L2.NET, you just have to give it a chance and get away from old habits and expectations.

[magalhaes]

l2net all the way

[josefcz]

2.net scripts may seem complicated,a few of them really are very complicated,but with a decent brain and a grain of logic it's not really that difficult to make net scripts better than walker ones

[dani3l]

3.84 is a really bad boy who kicks ass and takes names :),a huge list of improvements,and with L2Agita's LAZY :D scripts,it looks like u can a lot of stuff a lot easy than before

[Shomid]

Just let's see if they will be able to bypass rpg-club protection.if it will be so, l2net will get huge +1

[LagannBTT]

L2W is better for me cose eazier way to make scripts and if u are a good scripeter u can make almost anithink

 

with L2Walker you CAN'T do almost anything, is very basic with scripts

 

my experience with both programs tells me that L2Net is better, at first because is easier to connect to any server and i never have really any problem configuring the bot (and i dont know anything about making scripts, just basic things) and Walker is easy to configure in general, but that general part is very limited :/

 

[firenza]

Client packet

 

0F DB 4E 00 00 C7 1F 02 00 76 F2 FF FF 31 4E 00 00 C7 1F 02 00 76 F2 FF FF 01 00 00 00

Type: 0x0F (MoveBackwardToLocation)

Size: 29+2

Time: 18:06:40:350

0002 d ToX: 20187 (0x00004EDB)

0006 d ToY: 139207 (0x00021FC7)

000A d ToZ: -3466 (0xFFFFF276)

000E d OrigX: 20017 (0x00004E31)

0012 d OrigY: 139207 (0x00021FC7)

0016 d OrigZ: -3466 (0xFFFFF276)

001A d MoveMovement: 1 (0x00000001)

 

L2walker packet

0F DB 4E 00 00 C7 1F 02 00 76 F2 FF FF 31 4E 00 00 C7 1F 02 00 76 F2 FF FF

Type: 0x0F (MoveBackwardToLocation)

Size: 25+2

Time: 18:16:44:699

0002 d ToX: 20187 (0x00004EDB)

0006 d ToY: 139207 (0x00021FC7)

000A d ToZ: -3466 (0xFFFFF276)

000E d OrigX: 20017 (0x00004E31)

0012 d OrigY: 139207 (0x00021FC7)

0016 d OrigZ: -3466 (0xFFFFF276)

 

banned. GJ l2walker.

 

 

Net FTW. dont need to worry about a script to make the bot send correct packet to the server just to move around.

[HaxFixer]

from my point of view l2w is easy to setup and run the bot but scipting is quiet limited in commands and also l2w have very often problem with moving and attacking mobs. like in fog were is many walls and very often stuck which causes bots die. another thing i discovered that the options of pathpoint is a bit dissapoining because the bot is not moving with the red line between the circules.

 

about l2n i cant say much because i haven't used it for a long time but the setuping it is more difficult and making scripts is just an horror:D