Jump to content
  • 0

Plz help


Question

Posted

Gia sas exo enan l2 emu hellbound server kai 8elo na me boi8isete se kati 8emata, 8elo na kano opoios paixtis kanei ena new char na bganei katef8ian 85 lvl, episis 8elo na mou peite pos 8a kano ston server px na mporoun na ftiaxnoun mono ena eidos class dld px mono orcades kai opoios px ftia3ei elf na to kanei auto delete o server delete i na min ginete kan na mporei na ton ftia3ei, a 8elo kai kati akoma, 8elo na kano ena monster pou opoion blepei na ton rixnei me ena hit dld an enas char ftasei se ena simio pou einai auto to monster na tou rixnei mia kai na peftei o char. Kai ena telefteo pos mporo px se ena eidos class na balo dika m skills gia arxika? dld 3ekinao me ena char na exo kapia skills pou 8elo etoima xoris na kano quest. :) Ty:)

 

Edit:  gia to pos na mporeis na dimiourgiseis mono ena class px mono orc to brika, tora 8elo omos ena allo otan pai8enei kapoios kai tou leei "to nearest village" na pataei alla na ton 3anabgazei ekei pou einai akribos na min ton pigenei stis kontines poleis.

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

loipon file tha s apantisw se osa mporw. proton. g na mpori kapios na ginei 85 lvl tote prepi na parei exp. gt den vazeis ena exp rate kapw x2000000 etsi kai na valis ta gramlins na einai 5lvl? i na valis alla mob? me afto nmz tha paei katefthian 85. oso g to mob p les na ton rixnei me ena hit kane ena diko s mob mesa sto sql kai vale tou megalo aggro kai megalo p.def etsi opion di na ton rixnei me ena hit. oso g ta skills mporis na ta alaxis opws thes mesa apo to skill_trees.SQL. elpizw na voithisa kapos.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..