Jump to content
  • 0

Java problem..


Question

Posted

Hello everybody

 

Before all, i use aCis rev 185

I make some restrictions about pvp like these modifications :

 

public void onKillUpdatePvPKarma(L2Character target)

{

 

if (target == null) return;

if (!(target instanceof L2Playable)) return;

 

L2PcInstance targetPlayer = target.getActingPlayer();

L2PcInstance targetp = (L2PcInstance)getTarget();

    String ip = getClient().getConnection().getInetAddress().getHostAddress();

    String ip2 = targetPlayer.getClient().getConnection().getInetAddress().getHostAddress();

 

if (targetPlayer == null) return;                                          // Target player is null

if (targetPlayer == this) return;                                          // Target player is self

 

if (isCursedWeaponEquipped())

{

CursedWeaponsManager.getInstance().increaseKills(_cursedWeaponEquippedId);

return;

}

 

// If in duel and you kill (only can kill l2summon), do nothing

if (isInDuel() && targetPlayer.isInDuel()) return;

 

        // If in Arena, do nothing

if (isInsideZone(ZONE_PVP) || targetPlayer.isInsideZone(ZONE_PVP))

return;

 

        // Check if it's pvp

if ((checkIfPvP(target) && targetPlayer.getPvpFlag() != 0 && (ip != ip2) && (getParty() != targetPlayer.getParty()) && (getClanId() != targetPlayer.getClanId()))

|| (isInsideZone(ZONE_PVP) && targetPlayer.isInsideZone(ZONE_PVP))

&& (ip != ip2)

&& (getParty() != targetPlayer.getParty())

&& (getClanId() != targetPlayer.getClanId()))

            increasePvpKills();

// Target player doesn't have pvp flag set

else

{

// check about wars

if (targetPlayer.getClan() != null && getClan() != null

&& getClan().isAtWarWith(targetPlayer.getClanId())

&& targetPlayer.getClan().isAtWarWith(getClanId())

&& targetPlayer.getPledgeType() != L2Clan.SUBUNIT_ACADEMY

&& getPledgeType() != L2Clan.SUBUNIT_ACADEMY

&& (ip != ip2)

&& (getParty() != targetPlayer.getParty())

&& (getClanId() != targetPlayer.getClanId()))

{

// 'Both way war' -> 'PvP Kill'

increasePvpKills();

}

 

            // 'No war' or 'One way war' -> 'Normal PK'

            if (targetPlayer.getKarma() > 0)

{

if (Config.KARMA_AWARD_PK_KILL && (ip != ip2) && (getParty() != targetPlayer.getParty()) && (getClanId() != targetPlayer.getClanId()))

                    increasePvpKills();

}

else if (targetPlayer.getPvpFlag() == 0)

                increasePkKillsAndKarma(targetPlayer.getLevel());

}

}

 

But when restriction aren't respected (so when players are in party, or same ip, or same clan), anti feed work. But when all restriction are respected, i don't get any pvp points .. Why?

 

Cordially,

Gara

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

if ((checkIfPvP(target) && targetPlayer.getPvpFlag() != 0 && (ip != ip2) && (getParty() != targetPlayer.getParty()) && (getClanId() != targetPlayer.getClanId()))

            || (isInsideZone(ZONE_PVP) && targetPlayer.isInsideZone(ZONE_PVP))

              && (ip != ip2)

              && (getParty() != targetPlayer.getParty())

              && (getClanId() != targetPlayer.getClanId()))

 

this is all false.. you dont need it on check pvp ..

  • 0
Posted

sorry for double post but try this is more easy to add and effective.

 

  private void addItemReword(L2PcInstance targetPlayer)
  {
+
+
+	    //Anti feed Clan - Ally
+        if((getClanId() > 0 && targetPlayer.getClanId() > 0 && getClanId() == targetPlayer.getClanId()) || (getAllyId() > 0 && targetPlayer.getAllyId() > 0 && getAllyId() == targetPlayer.getAllyId()))
+        {
+        this.sendMessage("You are not allowed to farm pvp/pk points!");
+         _log.warning("PVP POINT FARM ATTEMPT: " + this.getName() + " and" + targetPlayer.getName() +". CLAN or ALLY.");
+        return;
+        }
+
+        //Anti Feed if player is under level 40
+        if(targetPlayer.getLevel() < 40)
+        {
+        this.sendMessage("You are not allowed to farm pvp/pk points!");
+        _log.warning("PVP POINT FARM ATTEMPT: " + this.getName() + " and" + targetPlayer.getName() +". NEWBIE PG.");
+        return;
+        }
+
+        //Anti Feed on Party   
+        if(this.getParty() != null && targetPlayer.getParty() != null)
+        {
+          if(this.getParty().equals(targetPlayer.getParty()))
+          {
+           this.sendMessage("Farm is punishable with Ban! Don't kill your party!");
+           _log.warning("PVP POINT FARM ATTEMPT: " + this.getName() + " and" + targetPlayer.getName() +". PARTY.");
+           return;
+          }        
+        }
+
+        //Anti Feed Same IP 
+        String ip1 = this.getClient().getConnection().getSocketChannel().socket().getInetAddress().getHostAddress();
+        String ip2 = targetPlayer.getClient().getConnection().getSocketChannel().socket().getInetAddress().getHostAddress();
+
+        if (ip1.equals(ip2))
+        {
+        this.sendMessage("Farm is punishable with Ban! Don't kill your party!");
+        _log.warning("PVP POINT FARM ATTEMPT: " + this.getName() + " and " + targetPlayer.getName() +". SAME IP.");
+        return;
+        }
+		
+	

credits to akken on gp paradise topic

  • 0
Posted

And where i call addItemReword(targetPlayer); ?

 

Edit : i've found the solution, i'm waiting a friend, to see the pvp with different ip. For the moment, antifeed work.

  • 0
Posted

And where i call addItemReword(targetPlayer); ?

 

Edit : i've found the solution, i'm waiting a friend, to see the pvp with different ip. For the moment, antifeed work.

 

on my pack i had additemreword , so possibility is to find by you own the possition , anyway ok

  • 0
Posted

My antifeed work.

 

I had remplace all increasepvpkills(); by addItemReword(TargetPlayer);

 

And at the end of AddItemReword class, i add increasepvpkillst();

 

Works fine, can lock.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • Mate your server used to play with full of bots, from where you find that revenue? 
    • IAM one of customers of this project. Have anti cheat, have user panel everything is working. Blocking adrenaline trashy plans without any problems.  So just GL for all lin2 project. I get support every time I need it. 
    • Convert package formats from Old to New in one click Create new packages of any format Lineage2Ver121 encryption (included in the package) Safe editing: work in a copy, full undo history (Ctrl+Z / Ctrl+Shift+Z), single "Save" button System integration Open .utx / .ugx files with a single click in Explorer (associations are registered during installation) One example: open a file and add its tab to an existing window Multilingual interface (EN, RU, UK, ES, PT, EL, KO, VI, ZH) — the language is picked up from the system Supported formats Packages: UTX, UGX Textures: RGBA8, DXT1, DXT3, DXT5, G16, P8 Resources: GFX (Scaleform) Requirements Windows. Java is not required—it's included in the build. Installation Run La2Tools-3.0.2.exe—the installer will create shortcuts and register related files. Alternatively, use the portable version. https://la2.tools/files/La2Tools_3.0.3_setup.exe   https://la2.tools/files/La2Tools_3.0.3_portable.zip  - Portable version  
    • WHEN SAYING “YES” IS A MISTAKE Not every project is worth taking on, even if the client is ready to pay. Sometimes refusing isn’t about losing money — it’s about protecting your reputation and time. Over the years, we’ve learned to quickly spot the cases that are almost guaranteed to turn into problems. Here are the most common situations where we turn down work: ▪ The client wants it “like everyone else’s,” but with lots of custom changes and on a minimal budget ▪ There are no proper source materials, yet the deadlines are already burning and everything is needed “yesterday” ▪ Constant changes to requirements after the work has already started ▪ A task with a very low chance of success, but very high expectations ▪ The client isn’t willing to discuss the process and sees us as just an executor - A good result almost always starts when both sides have an honest understanding of the risks and real possibilities of the project. If you’re currently discussing a project and unsure whether to move forward — write to us. We’ll honestly and directly tell you whether it’s worth taking on or if it’s better to look for another solution. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #documents #drawing #photoshop #refuse #cases
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..