Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

L2 Crossfire Guide

Gracia Final X5000 rates Server

Player regarding:

 

When you log in our server, you will notice that starter areas have newbie exp mobs, especially designed so you can easily level up to 76-78 level just on them. (Notice that grade penalty is not applied so whatever your level the use of any grade equipment is possible.)

L2 crossfire has pro npcs;

# An exceptional buffer, with every possible buff on it (except some special or high-level(80+) buffs, like Dance of Berserker or Dwarf buffs)

# Excellent gatekeeper, easy to use and with many ports available.

# And ofcourse Shops offering you anything you can imagine and even more.

 

So when you are at an adequate level, with 3rd class change, buffed and equiped it's suggested that you teleport to Varka or Ketra areas in order to level up until level 85. I guess what you are saying now: "What the -beep- leveling to 85 at vatra or ketra? Is he nuts? It will take years.." But Varka/Ketra mobs are modified, so they can be a good adena farming and exp area. (mobs are high level, but difficulty on killing them remains the same) After this, you can gather a party or start solo farming in order to obtain enough L2 Crossfire currency to upgrade your equipment. Meanwhile PvPing still remains priority number 1! Top equipment is optional for fun pals!

 

Server regarding:

 

There are 2 farming areas, probably places you 've never seen before; as we said l2 crossfire has nothing to do with the usual server you 've been playing!

Soon, class balance is going to finish (still under course). This means, that even useless class at high rate servers, like Fortune Seeker will be worth using!

An other huge change is done at the skills; no mp is required (except few skills like heal) nor items such as spirit ores (runestones).

It is possible to sub in any class; no more stupid restrictions like elf-dark elf or overlord/warsmith subs. The only rule on adding sub is that no race can sub to a kamael and vice versa for client reasons ( equipment is not displayed properly).

There is an auto TvT system. I strongly recommend to participate-rewards are worth the time and after all it's a PvP server, right?

And many many other changes left for you to discover!

 

 

P.S.: Gather your friends and try the high level raid bosses. Trust me!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Server running on

 

# 1000 Mbit uplink

# CPU Xeon Quadcore @ 2,13 GHz

# 6 GB DD3 RAM

# 2x 500 GB SATA II HDDs, 7.2k rpm

# Hardware Raid and Software Raid

# OS: Windows Server 2008 Pro

 

 

 

 

customized stas on vesper and dynadty

all skills almost work and Castiel (admin) works hard to balance classes (will be ready at January 5th)

 

 

 

hope to see u ig

 

http://l2crossfire.com/

Posted

 

Soon, class balance is going to finish (still under course). This means, that even useless class at high rate servers, like Fortune Seeker will be worth using!

 

 

so.. duelist is or will be playeable ? i mean, on all high rate server with full buff, this clase is a joke, because yours skill never crit on pvp 

Posted

so.. duelist is or will be playeable ? i mean, on all high rate server with full buff, this clase is a joke, because yours skill never crit on pvp 

 

it worths plzy glady and with the balance that admin is accomplishing glady will have more fun

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..