Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

D kserw an prepei na t pw bug afto i kolpaki pantws einai polu xrhsimo gia osous variountai t exp sta prwta idika lvl.. loipon kanete t eksis exete enan warlock high lvl p.x kai kanete party me ton mikro sas char.. pigenete s ena meros sta lvl tou warlock k vazete t gata na skotwnei ta mob k o warlock omws na einai makria... an exete ton low lvl char dipla sto gati 8a parete sxedon olo t exp eseis p 8a eperne o warlock.. dld me liga logia mesa se 5 lepta 40 lvl :P afto 8a einai arketa xrisimo gia academy otan ftiaxnete new chars..

osa topics koitaksa d t eixa.. sry an t exoun ksanagrapsei edw pera.. peite comments..

Posted

Pistevw re paidia oti ayta einai pia kanones toy l2 oloi etsi eksparoyn new chars egw pantos ton protimo toy astralized* ektos kai an den mporw na ton exp mono meta sta 45 lvl pou anagastika kanw to allo!!!

Posted

kian figis makria pos tha kaneis target ta mob gia na ta kill to pet?!! kai pisteuo pos den tha piasi gt automata to pet perni to 25-90% tou xp!! malon o srv itan pou eftege

Posted

kian figis makria pos tha kaneis target ta mob gia na ta kill to pet?!! kai pisteuo pos den tha piasi gt automata to pet perni to 25-90% tou xp!! malon o srv itan pou eftege

Loipon.. Gia na to eksigisw egw kala... To exw kanei se l2elixir alla oxi me warlock alla me dark avenger.... Gia paradeigma eisai 50 lvl warlock i DA.... pigaineis se ena meros p exei 50 lvl terata kai exeis pt ton char p 8elei to xp...kaneis targt to mob k kaneis attack apo tou pet ta "skills"... o walock fevgei makria gia na mn parei to xp k to xp pigainei sto pio kontino pt member dld tn low lvl.... ara gg nice xp..... kalo einai na exeis enan buffer eksw apo to pt na healarei to pet alliws bb to pet kai paei sta alla pt members.... to postarw etc gia na ktlvete pws ginetai mias k o l2senkss dn ka8etai na sas eksigisei kala...
Posted

Πολύ καλά...Το ενδεχόμενο όμως ο server να μην έχει πειραχτεί σε αυτά (επειδή κανονικά άμα έχεις κάνει spawn pet παίρνει ΠΑΡΑ πολύ xp) το σκεφτήκατε;

Συμφωνώ με τον Astralized μόνο εφόσον ο server είναι high rate, ειδάλως μέχρι να κάνεις lvl 80 100% char... :P

Posted

akrivws opws t eipa o spermatozwario einai.. d sas lew na t pate sto xiliometro p na min fenete t mob apla na eiste s kapws makrini apostasi g na min parete to exp.. sigekrimena me t KAI THE CAT eperna sxedon olo to xp ston l2existence.. pisteuw oti pianei s olous tous servers alla mono se afton t exw dokimasei..

Posted

PE φίλε EΛEOΣ αυτό ΔEN EINAI bug AΛΛA τυ ΓIA TON κόπο σου

koitakse terma pano k 8a deis p lew stin arxi oti borite na t pite i bug ite kolpaki.. k meta mila..

Posted

ontws einai ena aplo kolpaki alla egw na fantasteite ston l2elixir to ekana se kati 50 lvl mobs me dark avenger me pet dark panther k o char o low lvl mesa se 2 lepta apo 25 lvl pige 40...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • First of all, I never challenged you at any point.   Second, congratulations—this is what you should have done from the start: shown how it worked, how to exploit it, etc. Now, let’s look at the facts:   The flaw requires the person to be the OWNER of the castle.   It requires the use of third-party programs or a modified client—and most private servers don’t even allow the use of modified clients, thanks to their anti-cheat systems.   Are you honestly certain that a castle owner on a private server would risk losing their account just to pull off this exploit? They’d have to be a complete idiot.   You’ve spent months going on about how you discovered a bug that has ZERO impact on the actual gameplay—congratulations.   I’m not saying that flaws are bad or that they shouldn’t be fixed—in fact, the flaw *was* fixed.   What I’m saying is that you’ve been harping on the same point for months, even though the issue had already been resolved in the closed branch.   It’s the prerogative of those who maintain the code to fix things however they see fit, don’t you think?   And learn this: when you report a bug, you MUST: 1- Report the bug (obviously) 2- Explain in detail how the bug occurs 3- Prove that the bug actually happens   And instead of contributing to the project through the proper, public channels, you chose to turn this into a whole circus—I’d just like to understand why...   It’s a good thing everyone in this thread will get to see who the "asshole" is.
    • To use this exploit you have to:   1) Have access to the castle vault, aka you have to own a castle. 2) Send through Adrenaline Engine.BypassToServer(Bypass) as emommy said 3) In the crafted packet you will put a negative amount eg -100000000 What this does is it multiplies it by -1 so it becomes positive. 4) You won't see anything in your inventory, but if you open the castle vault through the Chamberlain you will see that the warehouse now has 10000000 adena. The negative became positive. 5) Withdraw the adena normally and you now have all the adena you need.   I wouldn't bother explaining how to do it, but this idiot (Galagard) wanted to challenge me. And from what I can see, they haven't patched the exploit even if I reported it to them a week ago so it's obvious that people will start sharing it around.   Maybe I should start positing here instead of the official channels.   All public versions of L2JMobius for all chronicles are vulnerable and not patched yet.   And thanks to this idiot (Galagard), everyone now knows.   Baldurian. EDIT:    Ok I just got informed that Mobius decided to accept the fix in the public repo.   So I will now post a proof of the exploit as Galagard requested. Normally I don't do so, but my good friend Galagard who has his nose so far stuck up his asshole, insulted me, and challenged me to show proof:     And to be fair to everyone, this is not an L2JMobius issue as the thread claims. It's L2JServer leftover, so if you have L2JServer derivative packs, you should patch too. 
    • Already fixed in subscriber version, but this bug report is classified as "Invalid" because since the author did not explain the method in detail, the validation flaw does indeed exist—but that alone does not prove it is possible to duplicate adena or any other item by exploiting said flaw. It looks like yet another AI hallucinating a vulnerability, then deducing that it could be used to exploit a different vulnerability. No have proofs in video or a detailed way to reproduce the potential failure Go find something else to do, Baldurian; you don’t even know how to exploit the flaw you reported yourself.
    • Interface sources for P196 (Secret of Empire 2 or aka Fafurion) for Main/Classic. This protocol is commonly used for classic interlude. You can use the xdat editors which support this protocol from my other shares.   NWindow + Interface UC + L2Editor Compiler   Download  
    • Interface sources for P166 (Secret of Empire 1) for Main/Classic. This protocol is commonly used for classic interlude. You can use the xdat editors which support this protocol from my other shares.   NWindow + Interface UC + L2Editor Compiler   Download  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..