Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Epidi tixeni na exw testari ta pio polla kai kserw apo p einai, k esy dn dinis tpt credits k to xeirotero einai oti epimeneis..

Wrea an exei etsi to pragma toulaxiston dixe to "search sto google" apo ekei p vrikes to shop.An dn apantisis 8a exeis alo ena -

Posted

katarxas tin gk vrika sto google kai 2on exei poli kairo alla tha ksanapsaxw se ligo an tin vrw tha s pw

 

dn exeis alla peri8oria gia psemata. ean dn di3eis to search perneis -1 k exeis 90% pi8anotites gia ban. toulaxiston pes tin ali8ia na glitoseis ta xeirotera

Posted

Well, Katevasa tin gk.. ontws einai klemeni... mporei na xeis dikio.. alla opws k na xei.. tn foustia ( xD ) sou tn ekanes k c... gt k esy esvises apo to arxeio .txt ayto p leei By : P@P@Xisis.....

Posted

pWwWw... dN ennow ta fixes p ekanes... ennow oti ekanes k c tin pagapontia sou... dn edwses ta kai kala credits ston p@p@xisis....

Posted

lol, tora ti na ta kanoume...? dn peirazei.. afiste to...

 

an borei kapoios as to kanei lock...

 

(Btw, Re Paidia Akouste Onoma Gia L2Developer.... P@P@Xisias..... An Einai Dinaton...! xD )

Posted

ne einai twra ta katevasa.... kai eixa palia TheMental Intelude.... opote....fanike kai apo to html... dn einai alagmeno L2 Oneo Dev grafei to npc gia tittle ....pantos tha drepomouna...re guys exei paraginei auto to topic kapios lock....dld eleos...

Posted

this forum has a very big percentage from leeched topics ... which here is allowed. But i recommend to give credits of course.

Apo oti vlepeis apo to quote pou ekana ta leei ola.

Ala dn einai wreo na mn c/p xoris credits..

Kai epidi exoume bgi offtopic edo kai wres locked.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..