Jump to content
  • 0

Question

Posted

I can't remember the Angels name but they used to be in Monastery of Silence. They were in the Library but after I believe C5 they took them out.

 

They were not the group Angels but the VERY large individual Angel that looked like it was 10-12 feet high (ingame messurements)

 

Does anyone know the ID or if the mob is still in the DB?

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

22124 Solina Brother 9C E8 A9 -1

22125 Solina Lay Brother 9C E8 A9 -1

22126 Silent Seeker 9C E8 A9 -1

22127 Silent Brother 9C E8 A9 -1

22128 Monastery Guardian 9C E8 A9 -1

22129 Warrior Monk 9C E8 A9 -1

22130 Divine Advocate 9C E8 A9 -1

22131 Pilgrim of Light 9C E8 A9 -1

22132 Judge of Light 9C E8 A9 -1

22133 Guardian of the Grail 9C E8 A9 -1

22134 Guardian of the Holy Land 9C E8 A9 -1

22135 Beholder of Light 9C E8 A9 -1

 

these are the mobs and the ids, from MOS. hope u found it through here.

  • 0
Posted

22124 Solina Brother 9C E8 A9 -1

22125 Solina Lay Brother 9C E8 A9 -1

22126 Silent Seeker 9C E8 A9 -1

22127 Silent Brother 9C E8 A9 -1

22128 Monastery Guardian 9C E8 A9 -1

22129 Warrior Monk 9C E8 A9 -1

22130 Divine Advocate 9C E8 A9 -1

22131 Pilgrim of Light 9C E8 A9 -1

22132 Judge of Light 9C E8 A9 -1

22133 Guardian of the Grail 9C E8 A9 -1

22134 Guardian of the Holy Land 9C E8 A9 -1

22135 Beholder of Light 9C E8 A9 -1

 

these are the mobs and the ids, from MOS. hope u found it through here.

 

Like I said, the mob is no longer there. Hasn't been since I believe C5 or CT1. It used to be in the library and it was a single Large Angel. I was wondering if the Angel is still in the DB because I can't find it. And I know it was not called Angel. It has another name. Thus why I can't find it.

  • 0
Posted

u didnt told me about that, its a raid boss.

25517	Master Anays	Raid Boss	9C	E8	A9	-1

this is his id.

 

 

and there's a second boss that dont spawn there, but it seems same with this one.

there's the second's boss id:

29096	Lord of Splendor Anays	Raid Boss	3F	8B	FE	-1

 

  • 0
Posted

u didnt told me about that, its a raid boss.

25517	Master Anays	Raid Boss	9C	E8	A9	-1

this is his id.

 

 

and there's a second boss that dont spawn there, but it seems same with this one.

there's the second's boss id:

29096	Lord of Splendor Anays	Raid Boss	3F	8B	FE	-1

 

No it's not a Raidboss either. Thank you for replying so quickly. Its a normal mob in an Angel look. But its huge, about twice the size of your character.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • First of all, I never challenged you at any point.   Second, congratulations—this is what you should have done from the start: shown how it worked, how to exploit it, etc. Now, let’s look at the facts:   The flaw requires the person to be the OWNER of the castle.   It requires the use of third-party programs or a modified client—and most private servers don’t even allow the use of modified clients, thanks to their anti-cheat systems.   Are you honestly certain that a castle owner on a private server would risk losing their account just to pull off this exploit? They’d have to be a complete idiot.   You’ve spent months going on about how you discovered a bug that has ZERO impact on the actual gameplay—congratulations.   I’m not saying that flaws are bad or that they shouldn’t be fixed—in fact, the flaw *was* fixed.   What I’m saying is that you’ve been harping on the same point for months, even though the issue had already been resolved in the closed branch.   It’s the prerogative of those who maintain the code to fix things however they see fit, don’t you think?   And learn this: when you report a bug, you MUST: 1- Report the bug (obviously) 2- Explain in detail how the bug occurs 3- Prove that the bug actually happens   And instead of contributing to the project through the proper, public channels, you chose to turn this into a whole circus—I’d just like to understand why...   It’s a good thing everyone in this thread will get to see who the "asshole" is.
    • To use this exploit you have to:   1) Have access to the castle vault, aka you have to own a castle. 2) Send through Adrenaline Engine.BypassToServer(Bypass) as emommy said 3) In the crafted packet you will put a negative amount eg -100000000 What this does is it multiplies it by -1 so it becomes positive. 4) You won't see anything in your inventory, but if you open the castle vault through the Chamberlain you will see that the warehouse now has 10000000 adena. The negative became positive. 5) Withdraw the adena normally and you now have all the adena you need.   I wouldn't bother explaining how to do it, but this idiot (Galagard) wanted to challenge me. And from what I can see, they haven't patched the exploit even if I reported it to them a week ago so it's obvious that people will start sharing it around.   Maybe I should start positing here instead of the official channels.   All public versions of L2JMobius for all chronicles are vulnerable and not patched yet.   And thanks to this idiot (Galagard), everyone now knows.   Baldurian. EDIT:    Ok I just got informed that Mobius decided to accept the fix in the public repo.   So I will now post a proof of the exploit as Galagard requested. Normally I don't do so, but my good friend Galagard who has his nose so far stuck up his asshole, insulted me, and challenged me to show proof:     And to be fair to everyone, this is not an L2JMobius issue as the thread claims. It's L2JServer leftover, so if you have L2JServer derivative packs, you should patch too. 
    • Already fixed in subscriber version, but this bug report is classified as "Invalid" because since the author did not explain the method in detail, the validation flaw does indeed exist—but that alone does not prove it is possible to duplicate adena or any other item by exploiting said flaw. It looks like yet another AI hallucinating a vulnerability, then deducing that it could be used to exploit a different vulnerability. No have proofs in video or a detailed way to reproduce the potential failure Go find something else to do, Baldurian; you don’t even know how to exploit the flaw you reported yourself.
    • Interface sources for P196 (Secret of Empire 2 or aka Fafurion) for Main/Classic. This protocol is commonly used for classic interlude. You can use the xdat editors which support this protocol from my other shares.   NWindow + Interface UC + L2Editor Compiler   Download  
    • Interface sources for P166 (Secret of Empire 1) for Main/Classic. This protocol is commonly used for classic interlude. You can use the xdat editors which support this protocol from my other shares.   NWindow + Interface UC + L2Editor Compiler   Download  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..