'Baggos' Posted September 9, 2012 Posted September 9, 2012 Already exists this code, but wants some changes on acis. I know he does not want much, but a convenience for beginners. net.sf.l2j.Config.java + public static int BLOW_FRONT_RATE; + public static int BLOW_SIDE_RATE; + public static int BLOW_BACK_RATE; + BLOW_FRONT_RATE = Integer.parseInt(baggos.getProperty("BlowRateFront", "40")); + BLOW_SIDE_RATE = Integer.parseInt(baggos.getProperty("BlowRateSide", "50")); + BLOW_BACK_RATE = Integer.parseInt(baggos.getProperty("BlowRateBEHIND", "70")); config: + # Blow Rate From BackStab. + BlowRateFront = 40 + BlowRateSide = 50 + BlowRateBehind = 70 net.sf.l2j.gameserver.handler.skillhandlers.Blow.java + import net.sf.l2j.Config; import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.handler.ISkillHandler; - public final static int FRONT = 50; - public final static int SIDE = 60; - public final static int BEHIND = 70; + public final static byte FRONT = 50; + public final static byte SIDE = 60; + public final static byte BEHIND = 70; + public static int FRONTBACKSTAB = Config.BLOW_FRONT_RATE; + public static int SIDEBACKSTAB = Config.BLOW_SIDE_RATE; + public static int BEHINDBACKSTAB = Config.BLOW_BACK_RATE; @Override public void useSkill(L2Character activeChar, L2Skill skill, L2Object[] targets) { + if(skill.getId() == 30) + { + FRONTBACKSTAB = Config.BLOW_BACK_RATE; + SIDEBACKSTAB = Config.BLOW_BACK_RATE; + BEHINDBACKSTAB = Config.BLOW_BACK_RATE; + } net.sf.l2j.gameserver.handler.skillhandlers.Pdam.java - target.reduceCurrentHp(damage, activeChar, skill); - + } + + // Backstab Modify + if(skill.getId() == 30) + { + double Hpdam = 0; + + if (damage >= target.getCurrentHp()) + { + target.setCurrentHp(0); + target.doDie(activeChar); + } + else + { + Hpdam = (target.getCurrentHp() - damage); + target.setCurrentHp(Hpdam); + }
dEvilKinG Posted September 9, 2012 Posted September 9, 2012 Diff file is missing things to remove, make it with eclipse.
Xanderॐ Posted September 9, 2012 Posted September 9, 2012 I think this patch is completelly wrong. Yes ?
Tryskell Posted September 9, 2012 Posted September 9, 2012 I think this patch is completelly wrong. Yes ? Both the patch and the thing includes inside it. Byte > integer, "baggos.", the main purpose of the patch itself is an error.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now